|
<<Return to Previous
Page
Page Modified
08/06/2008
|
|
Questions from the Public
A. Site Selection
-
Is it true that when the new Kane County Judicial Center was located
at its current site, it was also discussed/confirmed that a new jail
(designed to replace the current facility) would eventually be located
there as well? If so, are there documents that indicate such a
commitment (board resolutions, newspaper articles, etc...)?
In 1989 and 1993 a Master Plan regarding the placement of the Kane
County Judicial Center and related components (including a new Kane
County Sheriff's Office and Jail) was developed and adopted by the Kane
County Board. This Master Plan' placed the new Jail adjacent to the
existing Judicial Center. This 'Master Plan and any subsequent decisions
or resolutions made by the Kane County Board are available to all Kane
County residents. The 1989 study identify future potential court related
buildings but did not call out specifically the Jail and Sheriff’s
Office. The 1994 study analyzed a number of options that included the
location of the Jail and Sheriff’s Office at the Judicial Center site.
The 2004 VRJS Study (final report issued in 2005) further analyzed
options at the current and judicial center sites. Copies of the 1989,
1994 and VRJS studies are on the WEB site at the following links:
[ 1989 Kane
County Judicial Center Master Plan ] [
1994 County of Kane
Master Plan ] [
2005 Criminal Justice Planning Project (VRJS Study) ].
-
Please describe the decision process regarding placing this new jail
on the grounds of the Kane County Judicial Center. What factors were
used in coming to this conclusion? Why is this the best site?
Three master plans referenced in question 1 were developed over a 15
year period. Each master plan was presented to the Board of County
Commissioners for input and approval. Key factors that were used in the
master plans was compatibility of uses on the site, ability of the site
to accommodate expansion, initial capital costs, long-term operational
costs and staffing requirements.
-
A prime reason for re-locating the new jail to the campus of the
judicial center is to "save money on housing inmates
elsewhere"...estimated to be $1,890,000 annually. Can the same costs
savings be achieved by building a new facility at 777 Fabyan Parkway?
Yes, increasing the number of beds at either site will reduce the need
to house inmates in other counties.
-
Has it already been decided that the jail will be built on Peck Road
and Rt. 38? Was there a vote on whether the new jail should be built?
The Board of Commissioners adopted on June 8, 2004, a recommendation to
begin the design process to construct a new facility at the Judicial
Center site.
-
Have other sites been considered?
The VRJS study only analyzed facility expansion, renovation and/or
new construction at the current site on Fabyan Parkway and the Judicial
Center.
-
How can a jail be a good neighbor?
The following quote is from the National Institute of Corrections
Publication
Jail Site Evaluation and Selection 2nd Edition:
Modern technology allows new jails to be totally sealed buildings,
where outer walls of the building act as the security perimeter. This
means that neighbors do not have to see buildings surrounded by fencing
and razor ribbon under the glare of intense lighting. The public’s
negative reaction to jail construction is fueled by outdated visions of
what a jail will look like. Spend the time and effort to develop an
accurate image of your modern new jail, using drawings, models or photos
of completed modern jails elsewhere.
For further explanation, please see pages 10-12 of the publication
Jail Site Evaluation and Selection 2nd Edition.
-
What economic impact will the jail have on the surrounding areas and
home values? Will my property taxes be lowered because of the jail?
The following quote is from the National Institute of Corrections
Publication Jail Site Evaluation and Selection 2nd Edition.
The public also fears that jail construction or expansion will
depress property values and raise local crime rates. Several studies
have been conducted that looked at property values, crime rates, and
local economies of communities in the vicinity of correctional
facilities to determine what impacts, positive or negative, the facility
had in the area. In most cases the studies showed that new jails, if
properly designed, do not have adverse impacts on local property values
or any other aspect of the community. In a few instances property values
decreased in the vicinity of a new correctional facility but his was
thought to be due to an already existing trend in real estate values in
that area of some other non-facility factor. Some studies reported that
crimes rates dropped in areas surrounding new facilities.
For further explanation, please see pages 10-12 of the publication
Jail Site Evaluation and Selection 2nd Edition.
-
Is the proposed jail going to be connected to the current judicial
center on the south side of Route 38, or if it was going to be
constructed across the street from the judicial center on the north side
of Route 38 in the empty farm field?
Currently, the firm of Healy Bender is developing initial concepts
for linking the new facility to the Judicial Center. At this time, no
plans are being considered for construction on the north side of Route
38.
-
The FAQ's state the current jail is landlocked, but they don't
discuss the amount of space needed for the current facility or the area
needed for additions. Where can I find this type of information?
The VRJS 2004 study developed a very preliminary program of space
requirements of 337,804 gross square feet (GSF) for a new correctional
center. Currently, the County is developing a revised space program for
the Correctional Center and the Sheriff’s Office. That document will be
finalized by August 2005.
|
|